The article’s authors describe how presenting uncertainty in climate change science impacts both the nature of the science and the perception of the science. Being explicit about uncertainties makes for better science but uncertainty conveys less than what the public expects. Managing uncertainty is therefore necessary in order to avoid the misinterpretation of uncertainty by the public. People are often slow to take action when information is accompanied with uncertainty. Often, the introduction of uncertainty is more difficult for others to understand than statements of certainty. Framing the message of uncertainty often impacts the response that will result. One study showed how framing something in terms of gains often tends to solicit choices on the basis of certainty and framing in terms of loses solicits more risky choices. In climate change statements, when messages were negatively framed, engagement in climate change relevant behaviors decreased. Findings of this study show how communicating uncertainties of climate change in a positive frame are more effective at stimulated action compared to a negative framework. This article is useful in describing the various ways to frame uncertainties and how those frameworks influence the response of users of climate information.